How to deal with the paper? China Association for Science and Technology has a “ruler”

How to deal with the paper? Ministry of Science and Technology China Association for Science and Technology has a “foot” surging journalist Chen Ke since mid to late August, on the “tumor biology” period focused on the withdrawal of the issue, there have been several hospitals, colleges and universities published in the official website of the incident The “processing decision”. According to the surging news incomplete statistics, at least seven hospitals, colleges and universities have announced the decision to deal with (involving 16 articles were dismissed), according to the different circumstances of each person to give the appropriate punishment, the punishment includes: lifting the contract, cancel Promotion of job titles, cancellation of student status, the recovery of the use of abstract papers received bonuses and research funding, cancel the declaration of science and technology programs (special, fund, etc.) project qualification for several years, the party warning, credited to the integrity of credit information systems, scientific integrity Wait. There are a “ruler” behind these penalties. On September 14th, the surging news received a document entitled “Guidance on the handling of the authors” (hereinafter referred to as the “Guidance”), which dealt with the ” Policy boundaries “to provide guidance. April 20, the original Springer Publishing Group’s journal “Cancer Biology” announced a one-time withdrawal of 107 Chinese medical papers, the paper published from 2012 to 2015, the reasons for the withdrawal is false peer review. Once the incident has been reported, causing multi-concern. Ministry of Science and Technology, China Association for Science and Technology and the relevant departments, according to the May 27 State Council research and deployment of papers fake work special meeting requirements, the drafting of the “guidance”, and by the June 5 Joint Conference on scientific and technological integrity of the sixth meeting considered and adopted The “Guiding Opinions” put forward, the principle of handling is “unified scale, screening responsibility, grading processing, orderly publication, the formation of deterrence”, and “false behavior”, “serious academic misconduct”, “academic misconduct”, ” Fraudulent act “gives a definition. To different degrees of fraud to give different degrees of punishment measures: 1. The author of the paper to the “third party” to buy academic papers, commissioned by the “third party” to write academic papers or in the name of language to modify the real content, identified as counterfeiting, cancel its declaration of science and technology plans (special, fund, etc.) – 7 years (serious circumstances, permanent cancellation). 2. The author of the fictitious scientific experimental results, tampering with the conclusions, or forging, fabricating scientific data, etc., to cancel its declaration of science and technology projects (special, fund, etc.) qualifications such as 3 – 5 years (serious circumstances, permanent cancellation). 3. The author of the paper plagiarism, plagiarism or other fraud, cancel its declaration of science and technology programs (special, fund, etc.) qualifications such as 1-3 years. At the same time, there are three types of fraud, either of whom canceled their job title, included in scientific research integrity information system. The existence of the first fraud activists, in addition to scientific research integrity information system, will also be included in other areas of credit information system. There is a clear definition and processing of serious academic misconduct and academic misconduct: the commission of a third party on behalf of the investment papers, or provide false peer review experts and comments, identified as serious academic misconduct. Processing advice is to cancel its promotion job title, cancel the declaration of science and technology plan (special, fund, etc.) project qualifications such as 3-5 years (the circumstances are serious, permanent cancellation), and credited to scientific research integrity information system. The author of the paper violates the signature of the abstract, or arbitrarily marked, false marked to obtain scientific and technological plan (special, fund, etc.) funding, or unauthorized unauthorized use of data, a draft, etc., and other violations of academic academic papers Credibility requirements, identified as academic misconduct. Processing advice is to cancel its promotion job title, declare the science and technology plan (special, fund, etc.) project qualification 1-3 years, and credited to scientific research integrity information system. At the same time, the authors use the papers with fraud or other serious academic misconduct to obtain the science and technology plan (special, fund, etc.) project and research funding, honor and reward, job title promotion, degree, according to the situation to recover, , Suspended and other treatment. If the author of the paper belongs to the staff of the public institution, he shall also give a warning, record, reduce the grade or dismissal or dismissal according to the Regulations on Personnel Management of the Public Institutions and the Interim Provisions of the Staff of the Public Institutions. The author of the paper is a member of the Communist Party of China, and should be based on the “Regulations of the Communist Party of China Disciplinary Regulations”, respectively, to give a warning or serious warning, revoke the party positions or to stay in the party to see, dismissal of party discipline and other disciplinary action. In addition, the “treatment” referred to the “other circumstances of the treatment,” wrote: “(a) of the author of the investigation without error, responsible for the investigation and handling of the unit should promptly notify the author and its unit, to be clarified. ), The author of the paper should support the author’s request for “Cancer Biology” magazine to apologize or otherwise clarify it, due to the unilateral fault of the journal “Cancer Biology”. “Attachment:” (1) the author of the paper to the “third party” to the “third party”, “the third party”, “the third party”, “the third party”, “the third party” Purchase of academic papers, commissioned by the “third party” to write academic papers or in the name of language to modify the substance of the content, the abolition of his promotion title, declared science and technology plans (special, fund, etc.) qualifications such as 5-7 years; serious circumstances, Permanent cancellation of its declaration of science and technology programs (special, fund, etc.) projects and other qualifications. At the same time, credited to scientific research and other areas of credit information system. (B) the author of the fictitious scientific experimental results, tampering with the conclusions, or forged, fabricated scientific data, cancel their promotion title, declare the science and technology plan (special, fund, etc.) qualifications such as 3-5 years; the circumstances are serious, Permanent cancellation of its declaration of science and technology projects (special, fund, etc.) project qualification. At the same time, credited to scientific research integrity information system. If the author plagiarism, plagiarism or other fraud, cancel the promotionResponsibilities, declaration of science and technology plan (special, fund, etc.) qualifications such as 1-3 years. At the same time, credited to scientific research integrity information system. (3) The author of the paper violates the signature of the abstract, or arbitrarily marked, falsely marked the acquisition of the science and technology plan (special fund, fund, etc.), or unauthorized unauthorized use of data, a draft, etc. and other violations of academic academic Papers written and published in good faith requirements, the abolition of his promotion job title, declaration of science and technology programs (special, fund, etc.) qualifications such as 1-3 years. At the same time, credited to scientific research integrity information system. (4) The author of the paper entrusts the third party to vote on the paper, or provide false peer review experts and comments, cancel their promotion title, declare the science and technology plan (special, fund, etc.) project qualifications for 3-5 years. Serious circumstances, the permanent cancellation of its declaration of science and technology programs (special, fund, etc.) project qualifications. At the same time, credited to scientific research integrity information system. (5) The authors of the paper use the papers that have falsified or other serious academic misconduct to defraud the projects and special funds of the science and technology plan (special funds, funds, etc.), and have recovered the project funds used to undertake the tasks. , To cancel its commitment to recover the project funds used to undertake the task; is declaring, to terminate their eligibility. At the same time, cancel their promotion job title, declare the science and technology plan (special, fund, etc.) project qualification 5-7 years; the circumstances are serious, the permanent cancellation of its declared science and technology plan (special, fund, etc.) project qualification. Those who have the above acts should be credited with scientific credit and other areas of credit information system. (6) the author of the use of fraud or other serious academic misconduct of the thesis to cheat scientific and technological awards, academic awards, honorary title and other honors, revoked access to scientific and technological awards, academic awards, honorary title and other honors, recovery bonus; Or is recommended, to terminate its declaration of eligibility or to be recommended. (Special, fund, etc.) project qualification 5-7 years; the circumstances are serious, the permanent cancellation of its declaration of science and technology plan (special, fund, etc.) project qualification. Those who have the above acts should be credited with scientific credit and other areas of credit information system. (7) the author of the use of fraud or other serious academic misconduct of the paper as the main representative or the main basis for job title promotion, the revocation of the job title, to return to the previous job title. At the same time, cancel their promotion job title, declare the science and technology plan (special, fund, etc.) project qualification 5-7 years; serious circumstances, the permanent cancellation of its declared science and technology plan (special, fund, etc.) project qualification. For the false essay is not the main representative or the main basis, should be admonished to talk, and cancel its promotion job title, declare the science and technology plan (special, fund, etc.) project qualification for 3-5 years. Those who have the above acts should be credited with scientific credit and other areas of credit information system. (8) If the author obtains a degree by means of a paper with fraud or other serious academic misconduct, the degree granting institution shall grant a post degree to the author of the paper, grant a degree or cancel the degree according to law. (9) If the author of the paper has obtained or is declaring the scientific and technological innovation base and supporting all kinds of talents, such as fraud or other serious academic misconduct, he shall refer to this Article (5). (10) The author of the paper belongs to the staff of the public institution, there are papers or serious academic misconduct, but also should be based on “Personnel Personnel Management Regulations”, “public institutions staff disciplinary provisions,” were given warning, recorded, Job grade or dismissal, dismissal and other punishment. (11) The author of the paper is a member of the Communist Party of China, who has false or serious academic misconduct. He should also give a warning or serious warning, revoke the duties of the Party or remove the party, and dismiss the party according to the Regulations on Disciplinary Discipline of the Communist Party of China And other disciplinary action. Fourth, the treatment of other circumstances (a) of the investigation of the author without error, responsible for the investigation and handling of the unit should promptly notify the author and its unit, to be clarified. (2) The author of the paper should support the author’s request to “tumor biology” magazine to apologize publicly or to clarify it in other ways because of the unilateral fault caused by the unilateral fault of “tumor biology” magazine. (3) Those who do not directly participate in the thesis of the paper should be treated differently: 1. Before the publication of the paper has been known to be signed but not objection, to give notice of criticism; Dismissed the paper before the publication of no knowledge, after the notice was signed but did not take the initiative to withdraw, to give criticism of education; (5), (6), and (3) of the present Provisions, (7).

Article By :

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *